Brenda Siegel is executive director of End Homelessness Vermont.
NEWFANE-The Scott administration's announcement that it will implement the discriminatory practice that prevents people under 50 from having equal access to shelter as afforded under Act 113 is not only inhumane. It does not follow the law, which created no such prioritization categories and clearly states that those eligible for shelter are to receive it on a first-come, first-served basis.
These "priority categories" de-prioritize people experiencing homelessness and living with disabilities who are under the age of 50.
In recent days, we have seen multiple predictable and preventable deaths. Nearly all who have died from the impacts of living outside would be deprioritized under this inhumane policy.
It is unacceptable for the administration to continue practices that are causing loss of life in numbers greater than any natural disaster in Vermont. This is a human-made disaster.
It is time for Vermont to have a reckoning. We need to decide if we are committed to protecting the most vulnerable. Our state has to own these deaths, and we need to learn from them.
To reinstate the prioritization policy is to make a decision that the lives of people under 50 and living with disabilities are expendable.
Our most vulnerable Vermonters with complex needs under the age of 50 will be left outside at times during the winter. It will also require people living with disabilities to jump extremely high hurdles to access shelter.
To put this in context, if someone is under 50 and living with a disability - for example, in a wheelchair, on oxygen, with a significant medical condition or complex mental health challenge like schizophrenia - and they are not pregnant or fleeing domestic violence, they will not be able to access shelter using the regular process.
* * *
In addition to the growing death toll in Vermont as a result of this recent mass unsheltering, End Homelessness Vermont (EHVT) has received several calls from clients who are living outside and had been hospitalized for or were showing signs of hypothermia.
We have several clients who are struggling to breathe and at least one who has suffered a violent sexual assault. Of these calls, only two were people over the age of 50, but each lives with a disability.
After a mass unsheltering of over 1,000 Vermonters this fall, due to the administration's insistence that Vermont could not afford to keep our most vulnerable safe, the governor then stood up two family shelters with a price tag of no less than $3.2 million to accommodate 17 families.
To shelter these same families for the same time frame in a General Assistance hotel would cost $217,600 - meaning that this administration is paying $2.75 million more than is necessary to shelter 17 families while simultaneously saying that they do not prioritize Vermonters under 50 in wheelchairs, with health conditions, on oxygen, and with other significant and complex needs.
In the last two weeks, EHVT has had a client who, due to the impacts of living outside on oxygen and with diabetes, ended up with a blood infection that has now spread throughout his entire body. This is, unfortunately, not the first situation like this that our organization has seen. Putting people with complex needs and disabilities in a non-priority category is not only inhumane but extremely dangerous.
* * *
We are also concerned that the administration is creating a capacity issue by preventing the use of available hotel rooms. Some rooms are taken offline for non-health-related reasons. While our fellow Vermonters are dying in significant numbers, our state should be using every available tool in its toolbox.
End Homelessness Vermont is calling on the administration to take discriminatory prioritization categories off the table immediately and provide equal access to emergency shelter for all eligible Vermonters as intended in the law.
Our clients and others living with disabilities have a significant need for shelter, as do all Vermonters. Leaving any one person eligible under the law to suffer extreme consequences due to the administration blocking access to shelter is not acceptable. Protecting the most vulnerable does not include leaving people with disabilities or any Vermonter experiencing homelessness outside to fend for themselves. These are truly our most vulnerable Vermonters.
We cannot understand how the governor can justify implementing a procedure that will increase the death toll of people under 50 experiencing homelessness.
This Voices Viewpoint by Brenda Siegel originally appeared in End Homelessness Vermont and was republished in The Commons with permission.
This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at [email protected].