Voices

One-sided interpretation was intellectually dishonest

SAXTONS RIVER-Dan DeWalt, there's something wrong with your analysis.

I would suggest you read more history, specifically 1930s German. Maybe Isaac Babel. How about The Protocols of the Elders of Zion? The Turner Diaries?

When an organization such as Hamas says its goal is to kill Jews, builds a war machine to do it, then does it - pillages and rapes like the Cossacks - how is that not a genocidal act?

Where is your sympathy for those victims?

How is that different from the Nazis?

When does "public opinion among the vast majority of Arabs for the Palestinian cause" get translated into other Arab countries actually helping those innocent Palestinian children and those who hate Hamas but have to keep their mouths shut or get thrown off a building, as Hamas did to the Palestine Liberation Organization when they took over Gaza?

No question the response to Oct. 7 is brutal.

What's your plan?

And why does your other collaborator remain anonymous? The Commons shouldn't be publishing anonymous articles, even if the other half identifies himself.

I'm disappointed in this one-sided interpretation and feel it's intellectually dishonest.


Jack Peters

Saxtons River


This letter to the editor was submitted to The Commons.

This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at [email protected].

Subscribe to the newsletter for weekly updates